Powerotic
June 4, 2010
Some time ago on SMTR someone made the intelligent observation that there’s a difference between a power dynamic (something possibly quite sexy) and a power differential (something inevitably rather unattractive).
This has simmered on the back burner of my mind for some time now, but I think the difference is a set of reconciled symbols – or mutual functionality – or mutual, effective and successful love symbol negotiation, a specific kind of functional interactivity versus a general kind of inability to function (power differential).
As such, I think the most important aspect to a ‘power dynamic’ is the ‘dynamic’ part – i.e. that it functions, that it works for both people. Whatever dynamic a couple has, so long as it remains functional for both of them, I’ll bet it has equal potential to be sexy.

June 6, 2010 at 8:35 am
[...] at them or not). But I’ve been trying (as possibly many uxorious men do) to use the ‘powerotic‘ passion I have for my wife to get me motivated to do things I wouldn’t otherwise have [...]
June 28, 2010 at 8:54 am
[...] I am. But she appreciates that my deference is aimed at her and her happiness rather than merely at an (eroticized) power differential, or even at just the (eroticized) power dynamic, and ‘uxorious’ does not differentiate well enough between power (possibly tending as [...]