Powerotic

June 4, 2010

Some time ago on SMTR someone made the intelligent observation that there’s a difference between a power dynamic (something possibly quite sexy) and a power differential (something inevitably rather unattractive).

This has simmered on the back burner of my mind for some time now, but I think the difference is a set of reconciled symbols – or mutual functionality – or mutual, effective and successful love symbol negotiation, a specific kind of functional interactivity versus a general kind of inability to function (power differential).

As such, I think the most important aspect to a ‘power dynamic’ is the ‘dynamic’ part – i.e. that it functions, that it works for both people. Whatever dynamic a couple has, so long as it remains functional for both of them, I’ll bet it has equal potential to be sexy.

2 Responses to “Powerotic”


  1. [...] at them or not). But I’ve been trying (as possibly many uxorious men do) to use the ‘powerotic‘ passion I have for my wife to get me motivated to do things I wouldn’t otherwise have [...]


  2. [...] I am. But she appreciates that my deference is aimed at her and her happiness rather than merely at an (eroticized) power differential, or even at just the (eroticized) power dynamic, and ‘uxorious’ does not differentiate well enough between power (possibly tending as [...]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.